Tom Keiser <[email protected]> writes: > Agreed. However, if we utilize expediency as a filter, > draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names (now that we have resolutions to > the .xg IPR question, and concomitant stall at the ISE), > draft-wilkinson-afs3-rxgk, and draft-wilkinson-afs3-rxgk-afs seem, at > least to me, excellent candidates for consensus work in the near term.
Wholeheartedly agreed. If folks feel like they can drive the process forward, those would be excellent places to start. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
