On 8/30/2012 1:47 PM, Andrew Deason wrote: > On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:48:38 -0400 > Tom Keiser <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Agreed. However, if we utilize expediency as a filter, >> draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names (now that we have resolutions >> to the .xg IPR question, and concomitant stall at the ISE), >> draft-wilkinson-afs3-rxgk, and draft-wilkinson-afs3-rxgk-afs seem, at >> least to me, excellent candidates for consensus work in the near term. > > If we take the approach of focusing on 1 document at a time, > draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names sounds like a good first one to > me. However, is there anything I (or other "reviewers") could possibly > do? My "next task" on that for the past year or so has been to wait > for... I don't even know 'who' anymore. > > (Realistically, "1 doc at a time" doesn't need to actually be _one_ doc, > but a small fixed number keeps seeming like a good idea.)
draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names was approved by this group. There is nothing to do but implement it. Jeffrey Altman
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
