On 8/22/05, David Zülke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know you don't really like the distinction between those who mainly > develop the application and those who mainly use it, but in reality, there > is one. Some people will be quite passive (asking questions, filing bug > reports, stuff like that), and some people will actively participate by > discussing things, contributing code, giving advice, etc. It will be > somewhat impractical to _want_ everyone and their mother involved in every > decision. But I think the Agavi way of doing this has proved to be very > good, and thus I'm sure we will be able to listen to everybody who steps up > and objects, proposes, agrees, argues or whatever.
The point is, I dont want to discourage _anyone_ from getting involved. If everyone and their mother wants to weigh in with their 2 cents on a subject, all the better. I dont think anyone involved thus far truly has intentions to push anyone out of the process, but I think we should conciously give thought to how things are setup and expressed to encourage involvment from front to back. -Mike _______________________________________________ agavi-dev mailing list agavi-dev@agavi.org http://labworkz.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/agavi-dev
