https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/02/science/plants-consciousness-anesthesia.html?module=Promotron&region=Body&action=click&pgtype=article
Jim Bromer
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 8:01 PM Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Conscious experience - the soul or whatever it is - is not relevant to
> contemporary computer science. I do not agree with the dismissal of
> that feeling of experience either. As I told Marvin Minsky I do agree
> that whatever conscious experience is it probably has the potential to
> be explained by science one day, but right now it is a mystery.
>
> There are some complications of the experience of our existence, and
> those complications may be explained by the complex processes of mind.
> Since we can think we can think about the experience of life and
> interweave the strands of the experience of our existence. But that
> does not mean that the essential experience can be explained by
> complicated thinking or some other dismissive denial. The processes of
> higher intelligence may shed light on the complexity problem but the
> experience of consciousness is irrelevant to AI because it is not
> strictly a computational thing. It cannot be reduced by our theories
> of mind or life which are currently available and which are certainly
> not part of computer science.
> Jim Bromer
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 4:15 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, September 13, 2018, at 3:10 PM, Jim Bromer wrote:
> >
> > I don't even think that stuff is relevant.
> >
> >
> > Jim,
> >
> > It's relevant if consciousness is the secret sauce. and if it applies to 
> > the complexity problem.
> >
> > Would a non-conscious entity have a reason to develop AGI?
> >
> > John
> > Artificial General Intelligence List / AGI / see discussions + participants 
> > + delivery options Permalink

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T59bc38b5f7062dbd-Md9052ffefe7a514746abaa67
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to