> -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Bromer via AGI <[email protected]> > > "Randomness" is merely computational distance from agent perspective." > > That is really interesting but why the fixation on the particular > fictionalization? Randomness is computation distance from the agent > perspective? No it isn't.
Jim, OK, what then is between a compression agents perspective (or any agent for that matter) and randomness? Including shades of randomness to relatively "pure" randomness. > I will have to give up trying but you are not merely using > (specialized) linguistic reference markers. What you are saying makes enough > sense to me to want to think about it but the noise makes it more difficult to > understand. So yeah, I can see how randomness within a relative constraint > system might be related to computational distance - especially from [your > perspective[ of the agent's perspective. But even if I accept that as a > reasonable view, you later made this remarkable statement: "it's an operation > not a number or data point until you reach a boundary of thermodynamic > expense being a compressor agent in a virtualized escapism pulled back to > finite entropic reality." > >From an information theoretic (and thermodynamic) viewpoint in your mind what >happens when you see the symbol for infinity? Semi-quantitatively describe the >thought processes? John ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T55454c75265cabe2-M2d4b7f74746a361aa34f68eb Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
