Just saw that Matt Mahoney commented and I defer to him.

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:58 AM Andrés Gómez Emilsson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> If the algorithm for compression is good then forget about it. In that
> case the best (and near only) way is to uncompress the file and then
> re-compress it with the new, more effective algorithm.
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:53 PM Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> A discussion centered around pseudo randomness.
>>
>> As a private experiment on randomness, I once took published data of
>> cosmic noise and tabled it in an appropriate way. Within less than 54
>> iterations, emerged a consistent, embedded pattern. My conclusion was that
>> cosmic noise was pseudo random. Would my experiment destroy the lava-lamp
>> theory of true randomness? Possibly.
>>
>> Recently, someone quoted Gell Mann. His established view on randomness is
>> most enlightening.
>>
>> As far as I can tell, true randomness cannot be observed, because the
>> instant it is observed the energy of observation destroys the purity (or
>> truth) thereof. Unless you're a remote viewer,  or supernatural observer it
>> would seem that science has fallen foul of its own need for empirical
>> evidence. Solve the problem: How does one observe without observing at
>> all?
>>
>> Matt, I think you have earned an olive branch in that within a bridging,
>> scientific theory (Existentialism) you may call any thing whatever you
>> want, for as long as you have it clearly objectified; defined in terms of
>> meaningfulness and applied in a consistent, semantic manner. I think the
>> prior statement contains a hidden key.
>>
>> If so, then you may rely on the probability of your accepted version of
>> that thing. Further, to ensure it would remain correct and complete within
>> your particular system. How do you do that?
>>
>> Still, easy to translate across boundaries as well.
>>
>> *One's shoe may be another's steak. That is the nature of true relativity
>> in motion.
>>
>> Rob
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Jim Bromer via AGI <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Friday, 12 October 2018 3:34 AM
>> *To:* AGI
>> *Subject:* Re: [agi] Compressed Algorithms that can work on compressed
>> data.
>>
>> Matt said, "A string is random if there is no shorter description of
>> the string."
>>
>> That is a conjecture, or a hypothesis.
>>
>> Matt said, "... but there is no general algorithm to distinguish them in
>> any
>> language.
>> "Encrypted data appears random if you don't know the key. But it is not
>> random because it has a short description (compressed plaintext +
>> key). Kolmogorov proved that there is no general algorithm to tell the
>> difference."
>>
>> if there is no general algorithm to distinguish or detect them then
>> the hypothesis cannot be validated. While you might present a string
>> and declare it to be "random" the fact that you cannot prove that it
>> is the shortest description of the string and therefore purely random,
>> or random, then the conjecture cannot be sustained.
>> Jim Bromer
>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 1:37 PM Matt Mahoney via AGI
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:38 PM John Rose <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > OK, what then is between a compression agents perspective (or any
>> agent for that matter) and randomness? Including shades of randomness to
>> relatively "pure" randomness.
>> >
>> > A string is random if there is no shorter description of the string.
>> > Obviously this depends on which language you use to write
>> > descriptions. Formally, a description is a program that outputs the
>> > string. There are no "shades" of randomness. A string is random or
>> > not, but there is no general algorithm to distinguish them in any
>> > language. If there were, then AIXI and thus general intelligence would
>> > be computable.
>> >
>> > > From an information theoretic (and thermodynamic) viewpoint in your
>> mind what happens when you see the symbol for infinity? Semi-quantitatively
>> describe the thought processes?
>> >
>> > The same thing that happens when you see any other symbols like "2" or
>> > "+". Mathematics is the art of discovering rules for manipulating
>> > symbols that help us make real world predictions.
>> >
>> > --
>> > -- Matt Mahoney, [email protected]
>> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>*
>> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> +
>> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery
>> options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink
>> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T55454c75265cabe2-Mb162ece05c697e7f68694969>
>
>
> --
> Andrés Leonardo Gómez Emilsson
> Sentient Being (or Consciousness Narrative Stream, depending on how you
> want to look at it)
>


-- 
Andrés Leonardo Gómez Emilsson
Sentient Being (or Consciousness Narrative Stream, depending on how you
want to look at it)

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T55454c75265cabe2-M8dfcf318758e57b7984908a1
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to