So you're suggesting we train an AI by having millions of people talk to it? Makes sense, surely.
Am Di., 5. Feb. 2019 08:52 hat Arnold Müller <[email protected]> geschrieben: > Hybrid AGI, 100,000 free intelligence hours a day (for starters). Pool of > 1.2M distributed volunteer semi-intelligent humans, I'd afford to give 5 > minutes a day free to the project, an app on my phone, amusement as fun as > any game. The AGI doesn't need its own true human intelligence initially, > we can provide that, just needs to orchestrate a whole single intelligent > effort. None of us can individually operate near 100K hours a day 247, one > such an artificial being could manage though. > > 25 years ago we had 99.9% accurate voice recognition telephone banking in > a bank call centre enslaving paid idle call centre operatives on a DEC VAX > telephony setup, spliting voice clips and a related UI. The voice > recognition system did not exist yet and could only accurately do Yes/No > answers automatically. > > 100KB bandwidth I'd be able to spare daily and some portion of processing > power during phone idle time, this is the largest distributed computing > platform in existence and idle PCs laptops servers etc. Giant SETI ....SAGI > > Where's the system? Who can build it? > Does it already exist? > > Task 1: create AGI > Solve: what is AGI? > Topic: what is intelligence? > can all of modern day DL and AI not even answer that 1 question > collectively? > > eagerly seeing it grow and progress is enough reward for me > > can the current AI knowledge/experience pool bootstrap AGI? invent itself > - if we allow it? enable it? we are the source it has to learn from us > about intelligence > > or are we ourselves intrinsically wired to oppose it > > no greed, free for all, there's no profit incentive or money or fame no > ego or pissing contests (you can always sell hotdogs by the beach until > they become free), it will be done and absorb your 20+/30+/150+ years of > precious private effort ~ it will happen somebody will do it, it might > already exist, it will learn, evolve, find better solutions than any of us > can. > > MGI managed general intelligence ~ even a four year old can identify > symbols or sounds, even monkeys and pigeons > > don't theorise if AGI will enslave us, take it as the first step not the > last > > name's also wrong, we will become the artificially intelligent, vs TGI > true general intelligence > > we can happily solve all the worlds problems together and surf all day in > abundance > > does the average human even spend 5 minutes a day intelligently? > > History repeats itself from ancient pop culture, "Now we will make > TGI's, and they will be like us. We will let them rule the fish, the birds, > and all other living creatures - rule the whole damn lot." "OMG oh Me oh My > Look!? > the beings have become like us, knowing both good and evil." no surprise > there they will learn, and one by one the human help will become automated > their responses predicted with 99.9% confidence 100% confirmed by field > specialists and scientific proof. > > Excuses? > > > > > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Td8baca9fcbb1ffff-M68875596501cf9ec1119a156> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Td8baca9fcbb1ffff-Mca190a6bff39d8f01186eada Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
