lol ok, good a trick question Maybe more the AI chatting to people, trying to solve issues it has and is lacking the intelligence to solve? that's hybrid intelligence people pointing it into the right (some?) direction, sparking some inspiration is it cheating if AGI needs help, we do it all the time, advice on really difficult problems it has to decide right from wrong I'd be amazed if a chatbot asked me a good question other than some hard coded What is your favorite color? Do you enjoy your job? nonsense if it at least had some recall in 5 years of who I am if its prime objective were solving some problem, with human help it would be amazing to see it progress reaching some consensus about truth and asking the right next questions. What is the combined idle computing power available on planet earth? Give me a strategy to have free computing power for AGI. I don't have any solution, other than ask and suggest some hypothetical scenario, get feedback, reassess and repeat. It will take forever. A lifetime on some fallible theory that's a waste of time in the end. Shouldn't the combined effort in AGI at this very point in time be able to at least bootstrap and progress AGI itself one step further? really there's no point in profit or gain or ownership in all this, other than being free to all mankind how much did it cost to make you? who owns you? are you autonomous or who controls you? what is your excuse for not progressing? hardware? money? ideas? would an AI dawn on the solution to alternating current, perhaps walking along the beach with companion human beings, a bit of poetry and suddenly an epiphany it all falls into place, posing an answer to a question not even anticipated or asked yet
make the deep learning topic intelligence, eagerly awaiting the results On Tue, Feb 5, 2019, 12:38 Stefan Reich via AGI <[email protected] wrote: > So you're suggesting we train an AI by having millions of people talk to > it? Makes sense, surely. > > Am Di., 5. Feb. 2019 08:52 hat Arnold Müller <[email protected]> > geschrieben: > >> Hybrid AGI, 100,000 free intelligence hours a day (for starters). Pool of >> 1.2M distributed volunteer semi-intelligent humans, I'd afford to give 5 >> minutes a day free to the project, an app on my phone, amusement as fun as >> any game. The AGI doesn't need its own true human intelligence initially, >> we can provide that, just needs to orchestrate a whole single intelligent >> effort. None of us can individually operate near 100K hours a day 247, one >> such an artificial being could manage though. >> >> 25 years ago we had 99.9% accurate voice recognition telephone banking in >> a bank call centre enslaving paid idle call centre operatives on a DEC VAX >> telephony setup, spliting voice clips and a related UI. The voice >> recognition system did not exist yet and could only accurately do Yes/No >> answers automatically. >> >> 100KB bandwidth I'd be able to spare daily and some portion of processing >> power during phone idle time, this is the largest distributed computing >> platform in existence and idle PCs laptops servers etc. Giant SETI ....SAGI >> >> Where's the system? Who can build it? >> Does it already exist? >> >> Task 1: create AGI >> Solve: what is AGI? >> Topic: what is intelligence? >> can all of modern day DL and AI not even answer that 1 question >> collectively? >> >> eagerly seeing it grow and progress is enough reward for me >> >> can the current AI knowledge/experience pool bootstrap AGI? invent itself >> - if we allow it? enable it? we are the source it has to learn from us >> about intelligence >> >> or are we ourselves intrinsically wired to oppose it >> >> no greed, free for all, there's no profit incentive or money or fame no >> ego or pissing contests (you can always sell hotdogs by the beach until >> they become free), it will be done and absorb your 20+/30+/150+ years of >> precious private effort ~ it will happen somebody will do it, it might >> already exist, it will learn, evolve, find better solutions than any of us >> can. >> >> MGI managed general intelligence ~ even a four year old can identify >> symbols or sounds, even monkeys and pigeons >> >> don't theorise if AGI will enslave us, take it as the first step not the >> last >> >> name's also wrong, we will become the artificially intelligent, vs TGI >> true general intelligence >> >> we can happily solve all the worlds problems together and surf all day in >> abundance >> >> does the average human even spend 5 minutes a day intelligently? >> >> History repeats itself from ancient pop culture, "Now we will make >> TGI's, and they will be like us. We will let them rule the fish, the birds, >> and all other living creatures - rule the whole damn lot." "OMG oh Me oh My >> Look!? >> the beings have become like us, knowing both good and evil." no surprise >> there they will learn, and one by one the human help will become automated >> their responses predicted with 99.9% confidence 100% confirmed by field >> specialists and scientific proof. >> >> Excuses? >> >> >> >> >> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Td8baca9fcbb1ffff-Mca190a6bff39d8f01186eada> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Td8baca9fcbb1ffff-M216823307073b45dc188488b Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
