I am not sure what you are saying Nanograte. I can't remember what a schema
in AI is other than it might be some kind of partial definition like a set
of abstractions that might be filled in with specifics or something like
that. And what is the repetitive heuristic algorithm and why does it act as
a 2-sided sword? I do think I will need to use hierarchies but not in the
sense of a strict traditional logical hierarchy.
Jim Bromer


On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 1:59 PM Nanograte Knowledge Technologies <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Jim, I think what you're describing here has relevance for schemas.
> However, unless you have the relativist context pegged down, the schemas
> remain just schemas in a non-relativist universe. Somehow you'll need to
> tie it all together by means of hierarchy. You'll need to think out of the
> box some more on this one, until you've solved the repetitive, heuristic
> algorithm, which acts as a 2-sided sword. E.g., What if there was a 3rd
> supercat who lived in the box with the other 2, one that was immune to
> toxins and electricity?
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Jim Bromer <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 11 June 2019 19:32
> *To:* AGI
> *Subject:* Re: [agi] Re: A mathematics of concpetual relations?
>
> Mike,
> I again apologize for my strident and aggressive responses. I honestly do
> not mean to be disrespectful of the remarks that have been made in this
> thread.I just have a way of expressing myself which comes across as a
> little rough at times.
>
> Let me give you an example of something that I just thought about. Suppose
> I decided to use humongous numbers - maybe a million bits - but with the
> intention only to use a small part of it at a time for any computation. The
> bit positions might have some kind of meaning or some directive related to
> meaning. Then how can I efficiently represent these huge numbers in which
> only tiny disparate bits are relevant? This becomes a traditional
> compression problem. So suddenly, just because I am thinking about this in
> a special way, the impossible part becomes very possible - given that I
> might be able to come up with algorithms that could effectively work on
> these compressed numbers without having to decompress them first. This is
> an interesting thought. What makes it interesting is that I am not limited
> to some mundane application of a tired method like using vectors mapped
> onto 3-dimension space using traditional computational arithmetic or
> something. The freedom of thinking outside the box, even though it will
> usually be unsuccessful, illuminates whole new vistas.
> Jim Bromer
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 1:23 PM Mike Archbold <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> mean't "wasn't being dismissive". Typing too fast
>
> On 6/11/19, Mike Archbold <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Jim, It just reminded me of the Gardenfors work -- I was being at all
> > dismissive of your posts. I was just pointing the work out in case you
> > were not familiar with it. On the whole, I'm not dismissive of
> > anybody's ideas in AGI. It's all a wide open space IMO.
> >
> > On 6/11/19, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I remember that someone kept dismissing my notion of conceptual
> >> relativism
> >> and finally he mentioned some book that had been written 40 or 50 years
> >> ago
> >> which had mentioned that concepts were relative. I wondered - could it
> be
> >> true? Could someone have examined conceptual relativism decades ago? I
> >> did
> >> not find the book that he mentioned but I did find references to it and
> I
> >> found work that was done by the authors around the time the book was
> >> published. The authors mentioned a lot about the fact that concepts are
> >> relative and nothing about the notion that concepts are relativistic. It
> >> would be tedious of me to go over the difference again, but there is a
> >> major difference. The idea that I am talking about something that had
> >> been
> >> settled and the closed 20 or 50 years ago is dismissive. But it is also
> >> amusing because it means you are all chasing the latest fads (which are
> >> admittedly making great advances) while leaving the field of my special
> >> interests free, open, and unsullied for me. So thank you for not getting
> >> it. (I am not being cranky, I really believe that we are representative
> >> of
> >> the areas of interest that other people are pursuing, some much more
> >> effectively than we are, and this mini sampling indicates that there is
> >> something here that might be worthwhile for me to examine partly because
> >> there is not going to be much competition.)
> >> Jim Bromer
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:54 PM Mike Archbold <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This topic reminds me of this book from almost 20 years ago:
> >>>
> >>> https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/conceptual-spaces
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 6/11/19, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >  Generative Neural Networks, GAN.
> >>> >  This give give a relation from stating image or data to another.
> >>> >
> >>> > Latent Space Human Face Synthesis | Two Minute Papers #191:
> >>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aR6M0MQBo2w
> >>> >
> >>> >   A  programmer select two images or data points.
> >>> >   A  programmer put in 50 percent value into a GAM and train it to be
> >>> > 50
> >>> > percent transformation
> >>> > between to faces.  This 50 percent value is called a "latent value"
> >>> >
> >>> >  Latent value can used for mapping distance in weight space.
> >>> >
> https://towardsdatascience.com/graduating-in-gans-going-from-understanding-generative-adversarial-networks-to-running-your-own-39804c283399
> >>> >
> >>> >  The latent value can be used to make movement vectors through weight
> >>> > space:
> >>> > https://poloclub.github.io/ganlab/
> >>> >
> >>> >  Unsupervised GAN's are the way of the brain, artificial or real:
> >>> >
> https://www.academia.edu/37275998/A_Nice_Artificial_General_Intelligence_How_To_Make_A_Nice_Artificial_General_Intelligence
> 
> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>*
> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> +
> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery
> options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T395236743964cb4b-M20e598165dea2b1e293914b2>

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T395236743964cb4b-Md5786cba52661eb565f85bea
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to