On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:55 AM Steve Richfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> > OK, so let's see if I can explain RRAA in a short posting here. > ... > Thoughts? > You seem to have ignored my question, that's my thought. You claim to have defined a "logic" ... specifically, "reverse reductio ad absurdum logic" that you, apparently, have not subjected to anything remotely resembling a scholarly peer-reviewed process, nor stated in the language of formal logic. Is that correct? > > Steve Richfield > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019, 8:04 PM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If you have a proof of how to resolve disputes, you have a proof of how >> to select the better of two models of the world induced from the same set >> of data. >> >> Have you published this earth-shaking discovery with clear implications >> for machine learning? Or are you afraid if you publish, someone will >> implement it and turn us all into paperclips? >> >> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T8eabd59f2f06cc50-Me5e8b720bbcee7986a562878> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T8eabd59f2f06cc50-M3a48ddbe30bb152459f6e610 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
