OMG!!! You've discovered modus ponens!!! On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 2:11 PM Steve Richfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> James, > > Formal logic: > > h = Hidden assumption > A = Assertion > > If h -> A and h-> not A, then h MUST be false > > Now, please show me peer reviewed evidence that AGI is either possible or > desirable!!! > > Hey, I have published other similarly important stuff in peer reviewed > journals, but if it isn't something that is in the normal path that others > are following, then it just lays there, sometimes for years, sometimes > forever. For example, MOST patents find this fate. > > Our "intellectual" "system" is REALLY FUBAR. > > I could make a movie or write a book having spectacular examples. For > example, DeVinci carefully documented the process whereby sleeve bearings > wear out - a problem that remained unsolved until I got a patent on how to > keep this from happening. That was the beginning of an adventure leading > nowhere, as major corporations including Black & Dekker, Briggs & Stratton, > etc., each with working prototypes in hand, found profoundly stupid reasons > not to incorporate it into their products. > > Steve Richfield > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 10:15 AM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:55 AM Steve Richfield <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> OK, so let's see if I can explain RRAA in a short posting here. >>> >> ... >>> Thoughts? >>> >> >> You seem to have ignored my question, that's my thought. >> >> You claim to have defined a "logic" ... specifically, "reverse reductio >> ad absurdum logic" that you, apparently, have not subjected to anything >> remotely resembling a scholarly peer-reviewed process, nor stated in the >> language of formal logic. >> >> Is that correct? >> >> >> >>> >>> Steve Richfield >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019, 8:04 PM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> If you have a proof of how to resolve disputes, you have a proof of how >>>> to select the better of two models of the world induced from the same set >>>> of data. >>>> >>>> Have you published this earth-shaking discovery with clear implications >>>> for machine learning? Or are you afraid if you publish, someone will >>>> implement it and turn us all into paperclips? >>>> >>>> > > -- > Full employment can be had with the stoke of a pen. Simply institute a six > hour workday. That will easily create enough new jobs to bring back full > employment. > > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T8eabd59f2f06cc50-M9840116e709d09737d267629> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T8eabd59f2f06cc50-M46a1f86b5b1ef266aca3df42 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
