James, Formal logic:
h = Hidden assumption A = Assertion If h -> A and h-> not A, then h MUST be false Now, please show me peer reviewed evidence that AGI is either possible or desirable!!! Hey, I have published other similarly important stuff in peer reviewed journals, but if it isn't something that is in the normal path that others are following, then it just lays there, sometimes for years, sometimes forever. For example, MOST patents find this fate. Our "intellectual" "system" is REALLY FUBAR. I could make a movie or write a book having spectacular examples. For example, DeVinci carefully documented the process whereby sleeve bearings wear out - a problem that remained unsolved until I got a patent on how to keep this from happening. That was the beginning of an adventure leading nowhere, as major corporations including Black & Dekker, Briggs & Stratton, etc., each with working prototypes in hand, found profoundly stupid reasons not to incorporate it into their products. Steve Richfield On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 10:15 AM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:55 AM Steve Richfield <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> OK, so let's see if I can explain RRAA in a short posting here. >> > ... >> Thoughts? >> > > You seem to have ignored my question, that's my thought. > > You claim to have defined a "logic" ... specifically, "reverse reductio ad > absurdum logic" that you, apparently, have not subjected to anything > remotely resembling a scholarly peer-reviewed process, nor stated in the > language of formal logic. > > Is that correct? > > > >> >> Steve Richfield >> >> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019, 8:04 PM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> If you have a proof of how to resolve disputes, you have a proof of how >>> to select the better of two models of the world induced from the same set >>> of data. >>> >>> Have you published this earth-shaking discovery with clear implications >>> for machine learning? Or are you afraid if you publish, someone will >>> implement it and turn us all into paperclips? >>> >>> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T8eabd59f2f06cc50-M3a48ddbe30bb152459f6e610> > -- Full employment can be had with the stoke of a pen. Simply institute a six hour workday. That will easily create enough new jobs to bring back full employment. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T8eabd59f2f06cc50-M9840116e709d09737d267629 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
