While I agree that the value of a theory is to be found in its contribution to practice, you are underestimating the value of AIXI in this regard. Of course, you are far from alone and there is that old saw "safety in numbers."
I simply assumed that the premiere AGI theory, which AIXI _is_, would be sufficiently familiar to the denizens of an "AGI" group to sustain the use of acronyms for its two sub-theories. On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:33 AM John Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > So with SDT you were alluding to AIXI Sequential Decision Theory.... sorry > suffering from acronym overload here, need to rewind the Turing tape. > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T5bda8b8be25887f8-Mc801a10f95bf30f64798adb6> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T5bda8b8be25887f8-M4f1f2e7c37e7c99610073570 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
