On Monday, March 08, 2021, at 10:43 AM, James Bowery wrote: > I simply assumed that the premiere AGI theory, which AIXI _is_, would be > sufficiently familiar to the denizens of an "AGI" group to sustain the use of > acronyms for its two sub-theories.
Oh AIXI! I remember now! It was the main discussion on this list hashed and rehashed like a decade ago... So was NKS but not nearly as much. Many people don't remember what NKS is. Maybe AIXI can be reformulated in NKS with some sort of practical efficiency? Probably not. > Ockham's Razor as rigorously formalized by the size prior of AIXI's AIT > subtheory is useful to sweep away the egregious politicization of the phrase > "algorithmic bias". IMO exceptions to Ockham's Razor are more important to AGI than Ockham's Razor itself. But that's just a personal opinion. All jesting aside AIXI is good :) We cool. As is/was AIXI lite, the "implementable" version (I forget the acronym on that one). ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T5bda8b8be25887f8-Meffa63ddf767807c866ca003 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
