to Boris Kazachenko has there been made a ai system with your cognitive algorithm in it?
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 4:01 PM Mike Archbold <[email protected]> wrote: > and also from https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/382304 > > > > OK, now I'll shut up :) > > On 9/13/21, Mike Archbold <[email protected]> wrote: > > This timely article is making the rounds on social media today -- > > > > https://thegradient.pub/has-ai-found-a-new-foundation/ > > > > I thought it was interesting how many times "understand" came up with > > respect to AI. > > > > On 9/7/21, Mike Archbold <[email protected]> wrote: > https://www.meetup.com/Northwest-Artificial-General-Intelligence-Meetup-Group/events/280242958/ > >> > >> It's common to hear claims in AI -- particularly by marketing types > >> and other evangelists -- that their AI/robotics based technology > >> "understands." They want to persuade. But what does a claim of > >> "understanding" actually mean beyond the smoke screen of sales > >> rhetoric? > >> > >> The problem is a tacit claim is often being made that the machine's > >> understanding is equivalent to human understanding -- at least in some > >> narrow task. That's what they want you to assume. But in what form is > >> the understanding? How deep? Does it mean that novel cases can be > >> understood and thus explained? At what point does the machine's > >> understanding fail? It seems that "understanding" definitions are > >> crucial: the boundaries of the machine's functionality appear to be > >> the boundaries of its understanding. > >> > >> The user is invariably left to draw his/her own conclusions about the > >> extent to which the machine's understanding resembles human > >> understanding -- which is itself difficult to define. > >> > >> Since this issue is at the very core of artificial general > >> intelligence, a two-part series is planned. > >> > >> For this event, Part I, we will be making an informal survey of the > >> topic with this agenda: > >> > >> 1) Philippe Delmeire has prepared some brief materials (short videos, > >> images, text) to get us attuned to the topic. > >> > >> 2) Mike Archbold (organizer) has prepared a community survey of > >> definitions of understanding, particularly with respect to how a > >> machine should understand. We will critique the definitions. Jim > >> Bromer is working on highlights of the definitions. The current > >> version of the survey draft can be found here -> > >> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Kij_Ak5uSWTkxdM2vDKBbpEuXdFtJrqj/view?usp=sharing ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T2ee04a3eb9a964b5-Mcffd429076a580b20dff9063 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
