Since you have to have some kind of ordering (or system of orderings) to define random within, I believe you are going to find that random is somewhat problematic. For example, you might talk about a range for the value of randomness. Why should randomness be binary? But while this seems like it might be more sophisticated, and in my opinion, it makes more sense, it also leads to complications. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T5ff6237e11d945fb-Mf04d9fd3f3dbf7e07fd1f1c8 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less James Bowery
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less Jim Bromer
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less Jim Bromer
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less Jim Bromer
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less Jim Bromer
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less James Bowery
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less Matt Mahoney
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less James Bowery
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less John Rose
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less James Bowery
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less Jim Bromer
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less Jim Bromer
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less James Bowery
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less Jim Bromer
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less John Rose
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less csmicahelliott
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less John Rose
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less csmicahelliott
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less John Rose
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less Matt Mahoney
- Re: [agi] All Compression is Lossy, More or Less James Bowery