Thanks for ignoring my contribution and AGI-relevant take on this. Clearly, you are here to promote your personal agenda only, not to further your inclusive understanding.
It stimulates my sense of being a sarcastic bastard, and as follows: "Agreed, especially those scientist crackpots from Cambridge University, right?" On a more-serious note, please stop being callous about deaths, especially those of babies. People are dying. This human and economic carnage are being caused by a pathogen that, on a 50/50 probability, may have been engineered in a lab. If it makes you feel any better, then blame it on persons who choose to exercise right-of-access to their DNA. That's commie style risk management. First, fix the vaccines. They are dangerous and are causing damage and death to people and babies. Those victims would probably not have been damaged and died if they didn't have the vaccines in their blood, which they shouldn't not have had. If only medical practitioners would aspirate needles when injecting. In a sinister twist, many nursing staff, or barely-qualified nursing staff, confess not knowing how to aspirate a needle, or even bully those who come for vaccinations and refuse to do that on request. Once the vaccine job is done properly, and "really" proven to stop the pathogen cold - as a vaccine should - only then those who are in doubt would feel confident to submit to the regime. I'm all in favour of vaccines. I just don't tolerate being experimented upon without my written consent, and without any liability on the side of the perpetrators. Again, such tyrannical practices belong with commie regimes, definitely not liberals and the free world. This has now become politicized, and mark my words, there would be wars over this. Yes, the chance is 50% that the pathogen may also have occurred naturally, but we'll never know for sure, because the relevant countries could not produce their patient zeroes. Science was blinded. Forensics are now moot. How convenient. Those who are implicated by the Cambridge report have issued a blanket amnesty on liability. Phew! That must've been a relief! And, your "stats" about Africa are quite incorrect. If you knew anything about Africa at all, you would know that they are notoriously useless at conducting a proper census. You ridicule those who look things up on the Internet, then you do the same. I wonder, how would men of no conscience ever be able to compute consciousness into a machine? Imagine what such machines would be "allowed" to do to our world? That's a terrifying thought. Best thing would be if all of this AGI stuff be put to a stop now, for the halting problem to be activated on further "intelligent" technologies. Perhaps via a worldwide natural disaster, to mimic the natural disaster in humanity we are now experiencing. This would be most appropriate, humankind begetting the reality we created for ourselves. I'd call that justice. We need humanity to return to caring hearts, not more machines. If humanity won't find their way by themselves, I'm all for nature taking corrective action. That's the only future hope I see for our children's children. Us, this lot, are madly out of control. Us, here, we're part of the problem, not the solution. If not, then prove me wrong. So, if you are convinced this pathogen was natural, then let it run its course and cull those who need to be culled. The "death march" has always been the right-sizing mechanism of hypertensive nature. Why fight nature on it? We cannot beat the odds. Go commando! Get the virus! Let's see who would ultimately survive. Maybe the ones holding out on subjecting themselves to experimental vaccinations are doing the most-natural thing? Are they not the courageous catalysts for long-term human immunity, risking repeated, mutative infections from the vaccine environment? Heaven forbid! Just not natural immunity! Demonize them! How stupid we are. There are creatures far more adaptive than us, purely because they do not try to control and fight nature. Maybe we do not deserve to be on top of the food chain anymore. I can see how this can be so. Death is easy. Living is hard. And considering all that is playing out in the world right now, on all fronts, wars, riots, disasters of security proportions on all fronts, it seems humankind have chosen the easy way out. We welcome death. If we would not stop ourselves soon, I'm 100% certain we would be stopped. One way, or another, history is the best predictor of future outcomes. Pathogen X is but one mutation away. Science has already warned against this. No vaccine will protect anyone, not even animals and maybe not even plants, nor computer devices. Our environment would consume us. We are all atoms, and increasingly living things. Ref: Stephen King's 'Under the Dome' ________________________________ From: Matt Mahoney <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, 24 November 2021 07:51 To: AGI <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [agi] drug name On Tue, Nov 23, 2021, 10:00 PM John Rose <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Also, there are the numerous individual situations suppressed by big media… taking away freedom of speech, freedom of movement, https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/11/23/canadian-whistleblowers-expose-13-stillborn-deaths-in-24-hours-at-lions-gate-hospital-caused-by-covid-19-vaccines/ The headline is misleading. The stillbirths occurred in vaccinated mothers because most people in the UK are vaccinated. This does not show that the vaccine caused it. Also the low death rate in Africa is mostly because the median age is 20. It is 43 in Europe. The covid-19 fatality rate doubles every 8 to 9 years of age just like it does for all causes combined. It deserves to be investigated whether chloroquine (for malaria) could be the cause. It was, and it doesn't work. It is always possible to prove anything you want with data from the internet. About half of published research results can't be replicated because science isn't exact and researchers need to publish. When the pandemic began we screened hundreds of drugs. By chance, 5% of them will appear effective with P < .05. So you have to test them again in a larger trial to see if it was just luck. Ivermectin was one of those drugs. But if you want to argue it works, you can find the study. But you're right about censorship. It would be better to let all the crackpots speak so we can ignore them, than try to silence them and give them attention and credibility. But I doubt we can go back. The more the tech giants try to save the world with the one truth, the more we expect them to. Artificial General Intelligence List<https://agi.topicbox.com/latest> / AGI / see discussions<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + participants<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery options<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tfc4d42f7fb128a4f-M10f67239a1182274e3068903> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tfc4d42f7fb128a4f-M1820463fc66b87d0aed06312 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
