The Turing Test is useless. Period. Full stop. #NotEVenWrong.
GJS On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 3:55 PM James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but all of the attempts to use GPT-3 to pass the > Turing Test are "stateless" in the following sense: > > All prior inputs to GPT-3 are appended to the current input, and the whole > mess is sent as a single input to GPT-3 always in the same state. > > GPT-3, itself, doesn't keep track of anything, which is why all of the > examples of "conversations" end up being pretty limited. You just can't > get away with this trick indefinitely because the input string becomes too > large. > > Now, not having read the Gato paper in much detail, it would _appear_ they > are taking the "sequence" thing a bit more seriously, so there may be some > hope it isn't pulling the same fakery. > > Is this true? > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T861334313bba231b-M17e0edd030d328093b1ceab0> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T861334313bba231b-Mc46889f4e30295f71256d8da Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
