I think the public will be satisfied with AI and think it is AGI if it passes the Turing test for them.
Developers will never be satisfied with just that, since we'll naturally suspect it's a trick. The developers are a micro-minority. On 6/10/22, Greg Staskowski <[email protected]> wrote: > The Turing Test is useless. > > Period. Full stop. #NotEVenWrong. > > GJS > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 3:55 PM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Correct me if I'm wrong, but all of the attempts to use GPT-3 to pass the >> Turing Test are "stateless" in the following sense: >> >> All prior inputs to GPT-3 are appended to the current input, and the >> whole >> mess is sent as a single input to GPT-3 always in the same state. >> >> GPT-3, itself, doesn't keep track of anything, which is why all of the >> examples of "conversations" end up being pretty limited. You just can't >> get away with this trick indefinitely because the input string becomes >> too >> large. >> >> Now, not having read the Gato paper in much detail, it would _appear_ >> they >> are taking the "sequence" thing a bit more seriously, so there may be >> some >> hope it isn't pulling the same fakery. >> >> Is this true? >> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* >> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + >> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + >> delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> >> Permalink >> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T861334313bba231b-M17e0edd030d328093b1ceab0> >> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T861334313bba231b-Mcdfed33838bb7b5166946695 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
