Actually it seems like it is part of the OpenAI sales pitch. They are saying they are in the "AGI space" and banking on people applying the Turing test. If it seems like it is AGI it's AGI. That's the cold-blooded marketing plan. And they have a lot of money and a lot of computing power to sell it.
On 6/10/22, Greg Staskowski <stask...@gmail.com> wrote: > The Turing Test is useless. > > Period. Full stop. #NotEVenWrong. > > GJS > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 3:55 PM James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Correct me if I'm wrong, but all of the attempts to use GPT-3 to pass the >> Turing Test are "stateless" in the following sense: >> >> All prior inputs to GPT-3 are appended to the current input, and the >> whole >> mess is sent as a single input to GPT-3 always in the same state. >> >> GPT-3, itself, doesn't keep track of anything, which is why all of the >> examples of "conversations" end up being pretty limited. You just can't >> get away with this trick indefinitely because the input string becomes >> too >> large. >> >> Now, not having read the Gato paper in much detail, it would _appear_ >> they >> are taking the "sequence" thing a bit more seriously, so there may be >> some >> hope it isn't pulling the same fakery. >> >> Is this true? >> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* >> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + >> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + >> delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> >> Permalink >> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T861334313bba231b-M17e0edd030d328093b1ceab0> >> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T861334313bba231b-M41fada63141ddcfd1338c200 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
