On 4/2/23, stefan.reich.maker.of.eye via AGI <[email protected]> wrote: > OpenAI & the other big boys. Mainly OpenAI.
It seems like the materials are now available to create rudimentary AI, but I don't think I'd say they "won." Looking at my three requirements for AGI, that it can understand, reason, and judge.... on the whole I think LLMs are on the continuum of all three somewhere. Yet, there are limitations. > > The guys who can actually afford to run 10,000 graphics cards. Because kid > you not, that's the main difference between them and us. Where the most > talent is assorted is open for debate. > > Without giving people equal chances, you will not find out who is actually > the most talented. Not saying Sam Altman isn't smart, far from it, > naturally. > > So they will get "A(G)I", and soon. > > And I use the parentheses here to distinguish it from real AGI, which I > think, what they do is not. It looks similar though and will fool people for > a while. In reality, they will create quite an abomination because after > all, we know neural networks are black boxes. See this article > <https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/elk-and-the-problem-of-truthful-ai> > for an explanation of the conundrum. > > Anyways, those guys won the race... for now. That's my message. I could be > sad but eh, what the heck. I talked to higher entities and have been > promised a money printing software. That's good enough for me as of now. > > Cheerio :) > > Stefan > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T45c9f2ee38eea7f7-M7eaab9b81c4f9e322e2a80c2 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
