On Wed, Nov 15, 2023, 2:26 PM <ivan.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is it even possible to have and interact true AI without providing it the > same rights that human do? >
By "true AI", do you mean passing the Turing test (which LLMs already do), or do you mean AGI, as in the ability to do everything that humans can do? That would mean solving vision, hearing, and robotics in addition to language. I assume you mean AGI, which we are making good progress on. Self driving cars are already safer than human drivers. I think the biggest hurdle, human level vision, will be solved with more computing power. Your home security and entertainment system should unlock your doors, know who is home, what you are doing, and when to call in an emergency. The two obvious applications of AGI are automating work and immortality by uploading. Both require human capabilities and the ability to predict human behavior. In the first case, it means predicting what you would want and taking actions to satisfy your goals. In the second case, it means predicting your actions and controlling a robot that looks like you to carry out those actions in real time. For example, it would know what foods you like and eat them even though it doesn't need to eat. Why would it be important for your robotic copy to have the same rights as you? How would your heirs feel if you left all of your estate to the company that maintains your upload and manages the algorithm that controls how your estate is spent, like buying food and a house that the robot doesn't need? > > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Ta4916cac28277893-M3562b54d234e7381ef6f1e88> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Ta4916cac28277893-Mee8671d1dafc7878d250614a Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
