Mike's response to me in the thread, "Image schemas control all forms
of action [Lakoff replies]" demonstrates what is wrong with the
"prediction" method of confirmation of a theory about the world.  Mike
acts as if he believes that since no one has a demonstration of an AGI
program that this proves that a computer program (an algorithm as he
calls it) is unable to deal effectively with new situations.  Most of
believe that this conclusion is completely wrong.  At the very least
his unanswered challenge does not in any way confirm his theory.

Now he might associate his prediction with a more constrained theory,
like he predicts that no one in this group has an actual working AGI
program and the lack of a taker for his challenge to produce one
verifies it.  Ok, but again the fact that no one is willing to accept
his challenge does not actually verify that.  There could be someone
who has a working AGI program.

But even if we take it as verifying evidence, there is still no way
that an automated program, which had to rely on prediction as a method
to confirm its theories can actually verify that the predicted event
truly happened and it truly verified its theory.  So even with a more
constrained theory, in order to use prediction as a method to confirm
a theory you first have to find a way to verify that the theory and
the prediction were well constructed, the theory and the prediction
were both uniquely interdependent and the observation by which the
prediction was "confirmed" was also uniquely correct.

In other words, if we had an AGI program that was able to think then
we might use the prediction method just as a human being might use it.
 Or misuse it.

This shows that the verification through prediction is a faulty a
concept as logic or any of the other would-be verification methods.

Jim Bromer


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to