Google is already adaptive. There is no way they could build a search engine that effective if it weren't. That approach to adaptivity can be applied on a much bigger scale, & will be.
On Aug 23, 2012 1:52 PM, Sergio Pissanetzky <[email protected]> wrote: Matt, Perhaps, but it would not be adaptive. Sergio From: Matt Mahoney <[email protected]>To: [email protected]: Re: [agi] Hugo de Garis on the Singhilarity Institute and the hopelessness of Friendly AI ...Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:55:56 -0400 The safest AI would be one that doesn't want anything. It would haveno goals and no motivations, no reward button and no utility tooptimize. It would be a vastly intelligent tool, a collection of allthe world's knowledge and the computing power to do whatever you wantwith it. Rather than think for itself, it would be an extension of ourown brains; a place to store your memories, communicate with anyone onthe planet, and do the work that you would if you knew more andthought faster. It would be collectively owned, controlled by nosingle person but by everyone that uses it. It would be the AI that weare actually building; the one in front of you that has alreadysurpassed human level intelligence in all but a few domains as itdoubles in size every 1.5 years. ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
