On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Sergio Pissanetzky <[email protected]> wrote: > No it's not. Because Watson and its program have been developed by humans. I > meant Google, as a machine, without any humans writing a program and telling > it how to learn to play chess.
So I guess what you want is a machine where you can describe the rules of chess or any other game using English words, and it will learn to play the game. That's a language modeling problem. It's one of the hard problems of AI that we haven't solved yet, along with vision, hearing, robotics, music, art, humor, and some others. I have no reason to believe that these problems won't be solved eventually. It will probably require a lot of computing power and a lot of human effort in programming and training. What do you suggest? -- Matt Mahoney, [email protected] ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
