On 02/10/2012, at 15.36, Ben Goertzel <[email protected]> wrote: > My feeling is that it's OK for AGI to have a system whose bulk is > semi-real-time, interacting with specialized hard-real-time components > as needed.... If you have an argument otherwise, I'll be happy to > listen ;) >
Not exactly. As we 've previously discussed I don't mind your design or even other unreal time designs at all. The idea, "your" idea, is that you will need the scaling factor (speed, storage) of the coming decades and hopefully scale up with the help of upcoming investments. My idea is that a different team, if so inclined, could take the real time route that a) presents very different challenges b) will be fit-for-purpose in some applications already in 2013. AT ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
