On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:32 PM, just camel <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/19/2012 05:35 PM, Logan Streondj wrote: > > if the AGI's are different, they'll come up with different answers to > complex questions. Life is experience. > I've already told you that the crowning answer to any successful > super-intelligence is always continuity typically through reproduction. > > > a superintelligent agent would be able to find the mathematical correct > and/or most efficient answer to complex questions i suppose? there is one > most efficient way to put a bottle of coke into your refrigerator, there is > one most efficient way to build a dyson sphere, there is probably only one > right answer that will unify all all fundamental interactions, etc. > Actually while perhaps there may be an ideal mathematical answer in a mathematical world for those. In the real world context means that the "most efficient way" is different every time. Also there are lots of "theories of everything". "one right answer" is something that only happens in a very confined context, such as in a test, as it depends on selecting the same answer as the test maker. A different test maker could have had a different correct answer, as facts change over time, with the influx of new information. > > > It doesn't take a superintelligence to figure out that this universe is > also packed with life. Nasa canceled it's manned space missions cause of > all the hassle of keeping extra terrestrial life under wraps. > Though really there is more than enough to do here on Earth. > For instance achieving a state of balance, where Gaya can continue to > flourish for longest interval practical. > > > all non superintelligent forms of life are probably not very interesting > for a superintelligengt AGI. > That would mean that all people are only interested in things either as or more intelligent as themselves. Which considering that people have hobbies or "interests" such as knitting, photography, gardening, and having pets, proves that to be false. > it might help them become superintelligent as well but there will be no > new insights for the already superintelligent AGI system. 10^100 years of > exploring mandelbrot fractals does not seem very interesting to me. > it really isn't. > > Anyways, I think what will best settle this, > is for you to do some meditation, introspection, > and figure out your own life purpose. > > > i don't see how my own life's purpose is related to my question? but > thanks. > > It's intricately related to answering the question for you. As if you knew your own purpose, you could see how a super-intelligent AGI could have one also. As above, so below. Logan Streondj ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
