Software cost is inversely proportional to its maturity. See http://poolparty.biz/pricing/
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Azn A <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. My conclusion was that the software is still too immature to be useful. > > Maybe 4 years ago. See: http://poolparty.biz/ > > 2. "the power of semantic web has less to do with the type of database > used and more to do with the algorithms and schema" > > Yeah, I don't know what they thought years ago...But that is > common knowledge now. > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Mark Nuzzolilo II <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I worked with graph databases and RDF stores for some time, and even took >> a shot at writing a book for it. But my conclusion was that the software >> is still too immature to be useful. The software is either extremely >> expensive, very buggy, or incomplete. All the studying I did led me to >> believe that the power of semantic web has less to do with the type of >> database used and more to do with the algorithms and schema, which can be >> ultimately represented in any type of database. Graph databases can be >> more intuitive for certain types of data, but I'd rather stick with >> well-established mature databases. A graph database can be simply no more >> than a document database with some additional schema and functions layered >> over it, as is the case with OrientDB. >> >> So I don't think that these new databases are a silver bullet for >> anything. It's the schema that matters. >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Azn A <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sir, you're talking to a creative genius here. I already know about >>> collective knowledge systems. In fact I plan to harness that power with a >>> family of semantic repositories, or RDF database management systems that >>> make up the backbone of the next generation Web of Data, known as Semantic >>> Web or Web 3.0. I have already developed software that is basically an >>> easy-to-use wiki that is powered by a metadata engine that tags >>> user-contributed data with semantical annotations that computers can >>> understand. >>> back-end. In other words, a services architecture that allows for all >>> of our apps to connect together and share one common data store. >>> >>> <http://www.listbox.com> >>> >> >> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> >> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10514698-9a8cda1e> | >> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription >> <http://www.listbox.com> >> > > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/2552162-5fb4be76> | > Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription > <http://www.listbox.com> > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
