I agree that existing tests for human child intelligence are basically fine for AGIs being built and taught via a human-development-related path...
However, I think such tests are useful as qualitative guides for folks working on AGI. I think if you start interpreting them as rigorous progress metrics, somebody is going to be able to hack a system to pass those early childhood tests without any capability of extending further on to adult intelligence.... -- Ben G On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Todor Arnaudov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Brett, > > Yes, for example myself. We've discussed a bit here, me and Ben, I think, > in 2011 or so. > > IMHO it's the most meaningful way of testing "human level" AI, all other > tests are unjustified, if they don't map into capabilities comparable to > human's. > Those are a must tests. > > As of formal specifications - I think it's already done and new explicit > definitions are not needed, just references to the educational standards. > > The capabilities of the AGI/SIGI can be mapped to particular age given > average human requirements/educational standards in particular domains - it > can be "as a 3 year old in language (so and so words, sentence complexity, > tenses, vocabulary, ...), 4 years socially (can play with other kids so and > so...) and as a 4-5 year old in maths - e.g. "can count to so and so, can > recognize which group of objects consists of more items, which lengths are > equal, etc. > > All the tests are already precisely defined in the developmental > psychology textbooks and educational requirements (manuals for teachers, > psychologists etc.) in all possible domains, starting from the expected > capabilities of infants at a given age, going to tests for a > child readiness to go to school (similar to ones in your paper), to all > kinds of examination in all subjects in school etc. > > I don't think that anything special should be defined, just the AGI should > be made to be general enough to learn to deal with all that. > > For example that series for preschool children: > http://izdatelstvo-slovo.com/poredica.php?poredica=1 > > To me is an already made fine grained AGI test for human-level > intelligence for ages 3-7. > > > ....* Todor "Tosh" Arnaudov ....* > * > .... Twenkid Research:* http://research.twenkid.com > > .... *Self-Improving General Intelligence Conference*: > http://artificial-mind.blogspot.com/2012/07/news-sigi-2012-1-first-sigi-agi.html > > *.... Todor Arnaudov's Researches Blog**: * > http://artificial-mind.blogspot.com > > > >> >> - *From:* Brett Ward <[email protected]> >> >> >> - *To:* AGI <[email protected]> >> >> >> - *Subject:* A test for less narrow artificial intelligence >> >> >> - *Date:* Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:58:14 +1100 >> >> > >> Hi All, >> Has anyone defined 'preschool' training/testing for AGI? >> Here's my draft: >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ISOrxL2i_K-w_FEpp9c_KXw-Qwf7bhcILCla72wm5xg/edit >> Thanks for your time. > > > > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/212726-deec6279> | > Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription > <http://www.listbox.com> > -- Ben Goertzel, PhD http://goertzel.org "My humanity is a constant self-overcoming" -- Friedrich Nietzsche ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
