On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Logan Streondj <[email protected]> wrote:

Before all you mama's boys get carried away let's remember that we,
armchair intelligence enthusiasts, are looking for actionable zoological
and anthropological clues, not just armchair anthropology, there are
different forums for protogossips and the unbearable lightness of
patriarchy.

Now, all mammals play the social game and, by definition, a version of the
gossip game. Also, may we be agnostic when it comes to  male-female
differences, north-south, young-old, straight-LGBT, west coast-east coast,
unless you are willing to deny any of these groupings their general
intelligence credentials. Having said all that, a test where a machine can
take the place of your useful pet, your guide dog, your guard dog etc,
would be quite a broad intelligence test already. So, need not limit
ourselves to the highly opaque history of the human species.

PS For what it's worth some recent analysis I've seen settled the issue of
human diet to my satisfaction: humans eat cooked food, of whatever
definition. Of course one of the best reasons to cook is to deal with
(rotting) meats, and also to use starches. Neither strategy is enormously
desirable in the garden of Eden, but venture a bit further out from the
ideal human habitat and it becomes an advantage to cook and eat everything.

AT



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to