Jim: I believe that an empirical evidentiary-based method is absolutely necessary for AGI.
Great. Excellent.And true. So show us you mean what you say, and let’s have some evidence that complexity is involved in a single AGI problem – or a single real world problem.. [And no evasive BS about how much evidence you’ve given in the past – give us some now – or give us links to this imaginary past]. P.S. You do realise BTW that maths and logic are forms of reasoning which do not and cannot use evidence – are abstract/artificial forms of reasoning? Logicomathematical “proofs”, for example, do not constitute *evidence*.. You have IOW committed yourself to finding an altogether new, metacognitively revolutionary, form of reasoning for AGI – wh. is just the sort of thing one would expect a revolutionary new realm of technology/intelligence would require. I hope you can keep up the good work. ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
