> > P.S. You do realise BTW that maths and logic are forms of reasoning which > do not and cannot use evidence – are abstract/artificial forms of > reasoning? Logicomathematical “proofs”, for example, do not constitute > *evidence*.. > >
Wait... what do you mean by "maths ... cannot use evidence"? Are you suggesting that Newton's Laws, for example, have not been to some extent validated based on comparison with empirical evidence?? ben g ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
