On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Mike Tintner <[email protected]>wrote:
> P.S. You do realise BTW that maths and logic are forms of reasoning which > do not and cannot use evidence – are abstract/artificial forms of > reasoning? Logicomathematical “proofs”, for example, do not constitute > *evidence*.. > I do not realize that. Jim Bromer On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Mike Tintner <[email protected]>wrote: > Jim: I believe that an empirical evidentiary-based method is absolutely > necessary for AGI. > > Great. Excellent.And true. So show us you mean what you say, and let’s > have some evidence that complexity is involved in a single AGI problem – or > a single real world problem.. [And no evasive BS about how much evidence > you’ve given in the past – give us some now – or give us links to this > imaginary past]. > > P.S. You do realise BTW that maths and logic are forms of reasoning which > do not and cannot use evidence – are abstract/artificial forms of > reasoning? Logicomathematical “proofs”, for example, do not constitute > *evidence*.. > > You have IOW committed yourself to finding an altogether new, > metacognitively revolutionary, form of reasoning for AGI – wh. is just the > sort of thing one would expect a revolutionary new realm of > technology/intelligence would require. I hope you can keep up the good work. > > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10561250-470149cf> | > Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription > <http://www.listbox.com> > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
