OK, here’s the deal. Mike is partially right... that’s the problem with banning 
him.

 

Existing languages actually inhibit our thinking and reasoning in many ways as 
does math. You have to jam or compress your thoughts into such a tight 
symbolistic bandwidth of conveyance. The human mind is capable of much more... 
As we become more educated in some ways we be become stupider. Future means of 
communication will require more symbols and bandwidth. I’ve studied this in 
depth when developing compression technology and experimenting with human 
short-term memory training software.

 

Some of the best coders I’ve ever seen were 12 year old kids and older gents 
who flunked out of college and have never studied an ounce of math past basic 
algebra.

 

A dog could be trained to write software with the right interface.

 

Mike’s issue is that he needs math to articulate all this and that he doesn’t 
have. He’s in a hole, being required to reason logicomathematically about 
non-logicomathematical reasoning. So in effect he is banning himself. And 
making a lot of noise while doing it.

 

John

 

 

From: Logan Streondj [mailto:[email protected]] 



On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 11:02 PM, David Clark <[email protected]> wrote:

I didn’t say CS wasn’t Math because I dislike Math!  I think saying that 
programming and CS is Math makes bad code and ignores many CS issues that have 
nothing to do with Math.

 

In 2000, I took 2, 3rd year Econometrics courses that in some 3 hour classes, 
had nothing but formulas on the board.  This is still Economics even though 
Math was heavily used.

 

Sure, math is used for a lot of things, so is language. 

I see math as a "domain-specific language". 

with HSPL I hope to make it more seameless integrated.

As you may have noticed, many humans, and females in particular don't like the 
squiggly spatially-oriented math language. It's very cryptic and off putting.

 

I haven’t looked up the definition for Math and Arithmetic but most people I 
have talked to, talk about Math being formulas with variables and Arithmetic 
being adding, subtracting etc.  People use simple Arithmetic in normal daily 
life and don’t call retail sales Math.

 

If  you look up curriculum guidelines for the Math subject in elementary 
school, you'll find that counting and arithmetic is a major component.  

Retail sales may require at least some rudimentary math skills, when getting 
change for instance,  though much has been outsourced to computers that do the 
actual tallying of product prices, calculating taxes and all that.

 

 

There are many concepts in Math that don’t work in CS and programming and many 
techniques that are strictly related to CS.

 

It seems that most PhD’s in Computer Science are given out for Math type work 
and are mostly awarded by Math Professors.  For 10 years in the 1980’s I had a 
partner who was a full Math professor so I am lamenting the distortion that CS 
is seen as just some kind of Math.  I have worked in the microcomputer field 
for the past 37 years and I hope I can be forgiven for feeling short changed by 
the Math fraternity.  Us CS professionals just get no respect.

 

For all the graduate student slave work and the work done by professors in CS, 
please tell me what major programming work has been accomplished by the ivory 
tower. 

 

Well, Gimp, and Google, likely among others.

I know Haskell is considered an Ivory Tower language, or so I was told in the 
chat rooms, as it has a high percentage of Phd users. 

 

My experience tells me that is you can’t program, at least you can teach!  
Doesn’t say much for our field does it?  

It's one of the reasons I couldn't finish University.

 

It was very difficult to understand how the formulas, and pictures related to 
programming. I understand words, and code. 

Like even in Linguistics, they had us drawing "syntax trees" :-|, I dono, just 
seems very silly, I've never needed to use them. 

Though it's hard to say how much, a significant quantity of university seems to 
be about making things more complicated, without necessarily doing anything 
useful. For example the field of philosophy, and epistemology in particular, 
that has been fighting over the definition of a few basic words for over a 
thousand years.

How could I possibly know how a dead person would react to something? It's just 
preposterous, their dead, get over it. Yet that is the basis of a large amount 
of philosphy university curriculum.

The AI major required taking philosophy, computer science, linguistics and 
psychology courses. It turned out to be so difficult, that they canceled it, so 
it's not really a big surprise I couldn't finish it.

 

My experience also tells me that the best programming that has been made in the 
past 25 years was mostly done by a team of one rather than a team of 
programmers (Obviously there are many exceptions but it does seem strange.).

 

that is quite reassuring thank you :-).

Though yes, I'd have to agree, some of the greatest projects were at least 
started and brought to a working state by a team of one.
Such as GCC, Linux kernel and Git. 

 

David Clark

 

Maybe one day, when I could do a full AI major online, without having to go to 
some university, with all it's social trappings and be faced with professors I 
have great difficulty  mustering any respect for. I'll be able to get a 
university degree.

University as I look at it, is a great place to find a smart spouse, but ya now 
that I have, it's kinda pointless. I had to brave through years of rejecting 
sub-par females at Uni, it would just be too much of a hassle to have to do it 
again -- don't need any more "bro's" either. Too many people also in such a 
small area, just makes one sympathize with all those depopulation plans. 

I'd prefer to have a nice shore side wilderness property with me sailboat and 
me family, maybe some community members milling about. Anyways, seems at 
present we'll get there within a decade on our current trajectory.   Though 
perhaps this AGI project or some related programming or book project could get 
us some extra money and community-members. 

 

We seem to have a lot of everything already though, money included. Guess it's 
a matter of perspective of course.

Anyways ya, I don't really understand your woe's with the CS/Math university 
awards dichotomy. My suggestion is to write out in detail what you'd like to 
achieve, or have happen, and then allow it to happen, perhaps helping it along 
a little :-). It's the programming of the world sometimes called magic ;-), 
though I guess planning may be a word you'd prefer to use. 





 

From: Logan Streondj [mailto: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]] 
Sent: December-31-12 11:47 PM


To: AGI
Subject: Re: [agi] Why Logic & Maths Have Sweet FA to do with Real world 
reasoning

 




-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to