Matt Mahoney wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Alan Grimes <[email protected]> wrote:
f(I) --> s
At last! All of the complexity of human civilization reduced to a
simple equation. We are saved! The singularity is imminent!
Look, people were flaying me alive for not defining the problem.
Defining use cases for AGI is just silly so I came up with a general
definition for the problem.
There, I defined a part of the problem.
See? It's defined!!
So what do people do?
Complain that the part of the problem that I defined doesn't cover
another part of the problem which I explicitly did not define. I am,
after all, talking off-hand on a mailing list.
Now you are pretending that my formal statement of the problem, which
people had been pestering me about, is actually a claimed solution. It
is merely a formal statement of the problem.
Goddamnit, people! When are you going to produce anything other than
absurdly inflated cost estimates?
hmmmmmmmzers, I just had a brainstorm about how I could develop a good
candidate for f() without much additional hardware.
oops lost it. =P
--
NOTICE: NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS, SEE ABOVE
Powers are not rights.
-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
