Obviously the definition is incomplete. An AGI must be able to do everything that you might pay a human to do.
Not everyone will agree with my definition either. On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Sergio Donal <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please, could you explain it a little bit further? > I do not understand it. > > The premise is that the input is structured, why is structure important? > What is 'f'? > Do you mean that 'f' is the intelligence-function, so intelligence is about > finding the structure in the input? > Why does 's' have to be a 'proper subset'? This point confuses me. > > And also, what happens if the intelligence has some kind of structure itself > (like memory from other derivations) so it is able to make sense of I and > make it useful for solving a problem, even when I was just random? > > I believe that I am missing the subject and object of the statement, like is > the intelligence a property of someone who finds the structure in I, or > something like that. > > Thanks! > Sergio > > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Alan Grimes <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Okay, here's a mathy definition of AI. >> >> Given some structured input I, with structure S >> >> AI is defined as >> >> f(I) --> s >> >> where s is a proper subset of S that can be derived from I with minimal >> ambiguity. >> >> This definition is partial but covers all forms of perception. -- -- Matt Mahoney, [email protected] ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
