AGI is a little beyond the fringe of feasibility right now. So there is almost
no risk of discovering that your criticism of someone's speculation about AGI
was really stupid. However, that does not mean that your criticisms are
insightful. If a criticism does not include something about a central issue of
AGI then it is not really that great a criticism. I do appreciate noting that
I used the wrong word and I appreciate the suggestion that I think about
presenting my ideas as if I was delivering a power point presentation to a
group. But a diagram of my ideas, for example, would not help at this point.
I haven't written the program or started dividing the AGI part into modules so
a diagram would just add to the nonsense. There is no question that a major
reason for this group is to discuss speculative ideas about AGI programs and
the fact that some people are not able to appreciate or get another person's
ideas them does not stand as an intellectual basis for a justification of
dismissing them. On the other hand, a person who has a good criticism now and
then but who is constantly badgering people who disagree with him is just
drowning himself out. I always think it is a waste to see someone who has
something to insightful to say once in a while but totally lacks the discretion
to know how to filter the garbage. Jim Bromer
-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
