On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Mike Tintner <[email protected]>wrote:
> Then why does he give Watson as his only example of progress? > Of course, his books give many many examples... > > There is not the slightest element of AGI progress – there is no > program that can be generative – that can “learn and generalize beyond > its original domain” per you. > > *Any discussions or predictions of AGI have to *start* from an > explanation of that fact. None do. * > ** > My explanation for this is that cognitive synergy is both necessary for achieving AGI with limited computing resources, and "tricky" (in a technical sense), http://multiverseaccordingtoben.blogspot.hk/2011/06/why-is-evaluating-partial-progress.html You may not like this explanation, but that's your problem ;p -- Ben ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
