Mike T, Junk Opencog, and you’ll find that AGI is *relatively* easy (!). – because, > unbeknownst to Jim and perhaps to you, robots *don’t* have to be > *algorithmically* programmed – they can be programmed to be creative and > do new things, not just the same old things – move along new lines, not > just the same old lines.. >
"Non-algorithmic programming" is an oxymoron ... unfortunately you (literally) don't really know what you're talking about ... If A) GI can't be achieved via supplying a robot with *algorithms* and letting it loose in the world and teaching it, THEN, this implies B) no classical, Turing or quantum computer can achieve GI with any *program* ... and also that no system describable via quantum mechanics can achieve AGI.... This is the case according to all scientifically and mathematically accepted definitions of "algorithm" and "program" ... Some smart folks such as Roger Penrose and Robert Rosen have maintained position B, though I don't agree with them... But your position as stated is not coherent... I suspect because you don't really know the meanings of the words you're using... -- Ben G ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
