Dmitry:I've been thinking that putting AI on cellphones and tablets could
assist the problem of exploring the real world and embodiment

Not just "assist", absolutely revolutionise the way we think about
computing and intelligence. The barrier between the Plato's cave of
intelligent thought about the world, and the world itself, is being
smashed.  Now - in principle, if not always yet in practice - you can
immediately be put physically in touch with what you are thinking about,
and not just have to think about it from a million mile distance. You don't
have to be a brain-in-a-box anymore.  Philosophising about & generally
understanding the effects of "mobile"/"in touch" computing vs "box/ed"/"out
of touch" computing, is v. important.   (For a glaring effect of the latter
see Anastasios' thread :)   )


On 20 July 2013 07:26, Dimitry Volfson <[email protected]> wrote:

>  On 7/16/2013 4:25 PM, Jim Bromer wrote:
>
> I would like to create an initial feasibility test, using a text-based IO,
> that would show the potential for intelligence across a broad range of
> subject matters (within that IO modality.)  I am not worrying about
> writing something that would be scalable to adult human level AGI.
>
>
> I think text is a brittle representation of an elastic reality.
>
> I believe that there has been something missing in AI/AGI.  Someone needs
> to show how one might create a good base for intelligently
> acquiring knowledge (ie using both rational and creative methods)
> which might be scaled up with some future computers system.  The sense that
> narrow AI can be pushed beyond human capabilities in certain human games
> that once seemed to demand higher general reasoning is a little unexpected
> and hard to understand without concluding that there must be some
> very basic AGI ideas that haven't been discovered.
>
> I think learning is about observing and recording scripts (sequences of
> observations and reactive actions) -> as memories and habits.
>
> Then we observe our context and follow a suitable script, yet we are free
> to change mid-script to another script if we observe that the context has
> changed. We can do this internally and call it planning. But we should
> still be free to change the planned script during real-world action.
>
> Possibly, there is a Bayesian selection of appropriate script.
>
> Play involves the exploration of possible scripts; sometimes we just throw
> our blocks in the air to see what happens.
>
> Anyway...
>
> Lately I've been thinking that putting AI on cellphones and tablets could
> assist the problem of exploring the real world and embodiment a bit...
> through the camera(s), gyroscope, microphone, and GPS. I'll wait for at
> least the third generation of google glasses and it's competitors before I
> endorse that... but that technology could be similarly helpful.
>
> And those are my thoughts for the month....
>
> -- Dimitry
>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/6952829-59a2eca5> | 
> Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription
> <http://www.listbox.com>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> *New Policy in Mississippi*
> March 2012-Drivers w/ no DUIs may qualify for $9/week car insurance...
> <http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3142/51ea2db19ce6d2db029f7st04vuc>
> TheFinanceAuthority.com<http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3142/51ea2db19ce6d2db029f7st04vuc>



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to