An AGI program cannot be -fully implemented- on a system that uses language alone but the prototype of such an AGI program can be. I feel that the inability to grasp this theoretical foundation represents a major flaw in your corporation's theoretical foundation. I would not know how to prove this but it seems so obvious to me that it is difficult for me not to find ways to validate it.
An AGI program has to have input output of course. The IO Data Environment has to be rich enough so that it contains a great variety of kinds of events that can be observed and interacted with. A conversational language has that sort of rich diversity. The problem is one of complexity (complicatedness) and not the rather minor issue of the constraints on the variety of IO modalities. This kind of complexity can be handled by designing systems that can handle it. However, this creates a dilemma. The solutions that are necessary to limit the complexity of the program will actually be adding to the complexity. This dilemma then becomes the essential problem. Jim Bromer On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Peter Voss <[email protected]> wrote: > Here’s a brief update on our new AGI (artificial general intelligence) R&D > company http://agi-innovations.com/newsFlash_1.html (please spread the > word) > > > > Things are moving! > > > > Peter > > > > AGI | Archives | Modify Your Subscription ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
