OpenCyc seems to have only fairly abstract concepts in it, not much that's
concrete

I played with ResearchCyc a number of years ago, it had more concrete stuff
(but costs $$ to use)....

But it seemed to me that connecting their ontology to anything outside
their ontology, would require a lot of work.   Their NLP system connects
their ontology to natural language terms, but it's proprietary....

(This is setting aside the question of whether a human-built ontology is
useful for AGI -- to my mind it could in principle be useful in peripheral
ways, but can't play a central role...)

-- ben


On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Duncan Murray via AGI <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>   I am looking to use OpenCyc, but am having trouble finding any recent
> examples / discussion on it anywhere. There are many requests on how to use
> it, but not a lot of examples or replies.
>
> Does anyone use it as an ontology, or do you have some examples on its
> use?  I realise OpenCyc is a subset of the full ontology Cyc, but are there
> other ontologies I should be looking at in terms of generic concept mapping?
>
> Thanks,
>   Duncan
>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/212726-deec6279> | Modify
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>
> Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com>
>



-- 
Ben Goertzel, PhD
http://goertzel.org

"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress
depends on the unreasonable man." -- George Bernard Shaw



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to