OpenCyc seems to have only fairly abstract concepts in it, not much that's concrete
I played with ResearchCyc a number of years ago, it had more concrete stuff (but costs $$ to use).... But it seemed to me that connecting their ontology to anything outside their ontology, would require a lot of work. Their NLP system connects their ontology to natural language terms, but it's proprietary.... (This is setting aside the question of whether a human-built ontology is useful for AGI -- to my mind it could in principle be useful in peripheral ways, but can't play a central role...) -- ben On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Duncan Murray via AGI <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > I am looking to use OpenCyc, but am having trouble finding any recent > examples / discussion on it anywhere. There are many requests on how to use > it, but not a lot of examples or replies. > > Does anyone use it as an ontology, or do you have some examples on its > use? I realise OpenCyc is a subset of the full ontology Cyc, but are there > other ontologies I should be looking at in terms of generic concept mapping? > > Thanks, > Duncan > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/212726-deec6279> | Modify > <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&> > Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com> > -- Ben Goertzel, PhD http://goertzel.org "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." -- George Bernard Shaw ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
