I think of JCB as the computer from Star Trek. JCB English Description - http://www.linker.com/jcb/TheRealDealSL.pdf
JCB Robotics Architecture diagram - https://www.facebook.com/AttentionManagementArchitectures/photos/a.217364258285578.55073.203359906352680/720788957943103/?type=3&theater You can give it declarative statements and it will store the information in it's knowlege base and attach a plausibility as well as other merit parameters. It deals with contradictions and opposing viewpoints. You can give it imperative statements and it will determine when and whether to execute the statements. You can give it rules and it will reason with the rules. You can ask it questions and it will respond. These features already work. Cheers, ~PM > Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 13:18:35 -0500 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [agi] Using opencyc as an Ontology > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:35:31PM -0800, Piaget Modeler via AGI wrote: > > In my opinion, your object language (Javascript) is too low level. > > really? I think of it as rather high level, > I'd like it to actually emulate the design paradigm of HDL's, > Hardware Description Languages, so it can compile down to FPGA's and > ASIC's, since that would be optimal for AGI's. > Can get 4 orders of magnitude performance increase by using FPGA's, > and likely much more using ASIC's. > > > Take a look at JCB English, or JCB Robotics. > > I couldn't locate what you are talking about. > Or are you refering to the Japanese Credit Bureau? > > > If you can speak it in SPEL, your target should be a reasoner, to which you > > can add propositions, and the reasoner can decide to accept or reject the > > propositions, as well as answer questions. > > While that is a possibility, the motto of SPEL is > "Your language to speak with all". > So it compiles to other human languages, and programming languages. > > > Why waste all that the effort on forming HTML > > when speech is one of the slowest and most error prone modalities? > > I'm not sure how HTML is relevant to this discussion. > Though SPEL documents could also compile to HTML or LaTeX, > if that is what you mean. > > Speech is much faster than typing, casual speach is 150-160 words per > minute, while policy debaters can speak as fast as 500 words per > minute. the world record being 637wpm. > > In terms of error-prone, can still type it out, > it is simply speakable, not necessarily spoken. > > > Just a thought. > > ~PM > > thanks for the feedback :-) > - LS > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/19999924-4a978ccc > Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
