There's the Chinese quantum network and they're building a first leg between
Beijing and Shanghai. The claim is unhackable, see:

http://english.caixin.com/2015-02-06/100782139.html

 

John

 

From: Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 6:58 PM
To: AGI
Subject: RE: [agi] Couple thoughts

 

@Mike

There is something unhackable, but we'll need to build it first.

> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 14:22:08 -0800
> Subject: Re: [agi] Couple thoughts
> From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> 
> I get the feeling there is nothing left unhackable. Even a
> typewriter, they can plant a effing video recorder somewhere and film
> you typing. It used to be you made fun of the guy with tin foil on
> his head to "block transmissions."
> 
> On 3/2/15, John Rose via AGI <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Matt Mahoney via AGI [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>
> >> Peers need to know when two messages are from the same source. If a
peer
> >> earns a reputation for being a reliable source of information (like
Google
> >> or
> >> your bank), then malicious peers will try to spoof messages from them.
To
> >> prevent this, peers sign their messages using a mutually agreed secret
> >> key
> >> chosen at random. After an initial exchange (using e.g.
Diffie-Hellman),
> >> I
> >> send you a message and a signature like SHA256(message + key). You
> >> receive
> >> the message, compute the signature, and compare it to the signature
that
> >> I
> >> sent you. Since nobody else knows the key, and the hash is not
invertible,
> >> you
> >> know the message must have come from me.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Well, that's the same as using HTTPS or another application layer
protocol
> > over TLS/SSL with certificates signed by a certificate authority no?
Though
> > in your communications protocol you control the signing and encryption
> > algorithm and everyone need not get a CA signed cert I suppose.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > AGI
> > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> > RSS Feed:
https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11943661-d9279dae
> > Modify Your Subscription:
> > https://www.listbox.com/member/? <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> &
> > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
> >
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> AGI
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26941503-0abb15dc
> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?
<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> &
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


AGI |  <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> Archives
<https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/248029-82d9122f> |
<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>
Modify Your Subscription

 <http://www.listbox.com> 

 




-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to