Its alive.....

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Mark Seveland <[email protected]> wrote:

> +===================================+
> | New Account Info                  |
> +===================================+
> | Domain: instituteofgeneralintelligence.tk
> | Ip: 192.185.121.233 (n)
> | HasCgi: y
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Mark Seveland <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not a web developer as such.  But I can set up Wordpress and a forum
>> if you like.
>>
>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:06 PM, colin hales <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Excellent.. It'll do for now.. Am not a web dev guy. Plant a flag and
>>> let it sit. Someone will have to own its development for a bit. While some
>>> proposed content takes shape. It doesn't have to be pretty!
>>>
>>> Time zone issues here. Gotta go.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Colin
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: Benjamin Kapp <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: ‎20/‎05/‎2015 11:47 AM
>>> To: AGI <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [agi] Institute of General Intelligence (IGI)
>>>
>>> I registered a free domain name
>>> INSTITUTEOFGENERALINTELLIGENCE.TK
>>>
>>> it is pointing to Mark's name servers.  Who wants to create a hello
>>> world web page so we can test it?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Colin Hales <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I put in a backorder and found out  igi.org t was gone afterwards. Doh.
>>>> Does the predation have to start so soon? There's always a shark.
>>>> OK. I'll ask. May take a while.
>>>> Dorian... It's your name. Have you any alternatives if this shark turns
>>>> out to be too hungry?
>>>> Leave it there for the moment.a
>>>> :-)
>>>> colin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Benjamin Kapp <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The domain name owner can be contacted at the e-mail address
>>>>> [email protected].  Ask him how much he wants for the domain.
>>>>>
>>>>> We can always just grab a free domain name and change later once the
>>>>> organization gets going.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Colin Hales <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't buy igi.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Benjamin Kapp <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The igi.org domain no longer seems to be offering its self for sale
>>>>>>> when I visit it.  Did someone buy it already?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Colin Hales <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Logan,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Logan Streondj <[email protected]
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 09:48:03AM +1000, colin hales wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > Sorry about the previous empty. Phone issue. 10 thumbs.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > My particular flavour of the non-computer approach is
>>>>>>>>> irrelevant. I am not pushing my own at all.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Robot $ and kind irrelevant. I have the math you speak of. Wrong
>>>>>>>>> on both counts.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > I do not care what kind of NC-AGI arises. All I know is that
>>>>>>>>> NC-AGI important, neglected and needs a champion.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> okay so obviously you are the champion.
>>>>>>>>> Why is it important?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Because it's never been done.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> you guys have been talking about it for a week now,
>>>>>>>>> and I still have no idea why you think it has value.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> like lets be honest here, anything that isn't a computer or
>>>>>>>>> technology is biology.  so what you are really talking about
>>>>>>>>> (seems to me) is biological-AGI, or connecting a vat of
>>>>>>>>> brain-cells to a computer.
>>>>>>>>> this has been done, and can play simple video games.
>>>>>>>>> but so can deep neuronets on computers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No it is not necessarily biology. H-AGI can use biological material
>>>>>>>> or make inorganic versions of the biological substrate. Mine is totally
>>>>>>>> inorganic.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And while hooking bio material to other hardware has been done, it
>>>>>>>> has not been done by anyone headed in the direction of an AGI. Pure wet
>>>>>>>> neuroscience? Yes. Machine learning? Yes. Robot control? Yes. This
>>>>>>>> particular approach is not what I intend. Dorian may be more 
>>>>>>>> interested in
>>>>>>>> that. I don't want to stop anyone doing any of it just because it 
>>>>>>>> clashes
>>>>>>>> with my own vision of it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > So please set anything you think you know about me or my
>>>>>>>>> approach aside. You actually know almost nothing and what little that 
>>>>>>>>> is is
>>>>>>>>> irrelevant to what is happening in this thread.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> okay so do you have some kind of proprietary secret approach?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I was thinking you can Dorian can sign an NDA and then no one
>>>>>>>>> will ever know about anything you guys do.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> personally I think that there are a lot of potential ethical
>>>>>>>>> issues with using biological mediums for computation, also they
>>>>>>>>> aren't particularly scalable or portable.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can see scalability. I can see portability. I can see
>>>>>>>> generativity. It will be clunky at first like all new ideas. It has an
>>>>>>>> organic and an inorganic aspect. All untried as H-AGI.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Both Dorian and I have written up and published everything that is
>>>>>>>> needed to get your head round the fundamentals, which I know can be 
>>>>>>>> hard to
>>>>>>>> see for those without the biophysics. We have both argued for a long 
>>>>>>>> time,
>>>>>>>> one way or another, that the approach is novel. The one-liner 
>>>>>>>> explanation:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *H-AGI is where the brain physics essential to an AGI is identified
>>>>>>>> and included in an AGI substrate. This is achieved by actually
>>>>>>>> replicating the physics (organic/inorganic, doesn't matter) and 
>>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>>> that physics on the substrate then and testing its performance against
>>>>>>>> alternatives that lack that physics (i.e. that might ignore it or 
>>>>>>>> model it,
>>>>>>>> replacing it with the physics of the instantiation of the model, 
>>>>>>>> whatever
>>>>>>>> that might be).*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So it's rather simple. Both Dorian and I have identified candidate
>>>>>>>> 'low-hanging fruit' physics. There may be others. That physics may be 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> crucial missing link that has dogged AGI for decades. If so, then all
>>>>>>>> activity that did not include that essential physics was actually 
>>>>>>>> destined
>>>>>>>> to underperform in mysterious ways that it is H-AGIs job to sort out. 
>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>> IGI, if it existed, would do that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes there are heaps of ethical issues with any AGI approach. The
>>>>>>>> H-AGI inorganic version will have one ethics/risk landscape, the H-AGI
>>>>>>>> organic version another. Both of these will contrast with the C-AGI 
>>>>>>>> risk
>>>>>>>> landscape. In what ways? I dunno! Let's find out!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Colin Hales
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    *AGI* | Archives
>>>>>>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
>>>>>>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26973278-698fd9ee>
>>>>>>>> | Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
>>>>>>>> <http://www.listbox.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    *AGI* | Archives
>>>>>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
>>>>>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11721311-20a65d4a>
>>>>>>> | Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
>>>>>>> <http://www.listbox.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
>>>>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26973278-698fd9ee> |
>>>>>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
>>>>>> <http://www.listbox.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
>>>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11721311-20a65d4a> |
>>>>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
>>>>> <http://www.listbox.com>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
>>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26973278-698fd9ee> |
>>>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
>>>> <http://www.listbox.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11721311-20a65d4a> |
>>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
>>> <http://www.listbox.com>
>>>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/27079473-66e47b26> |
>>> Modify
>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>
>>> Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Mark Seveland
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mark Seveland
>



-- 
Regards,
Mark Seveland



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to