Thank you.

I agree.  Ben's suggested a few videos for the gallery.  I got some other
ideas on presenting existing initiatives.


On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Piaget Modeler <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Looks solid for a few days work. well done.
>
> But now the real work begins, providing serious content based on actual
> work.
>
> Good luck.
>
> ~PM
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 20:56:41 -0700
> Subject: Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
>
> my email is mseveland (at) gmail (dot) com.  Please feel free to contact
> me if you would like:
>
> 1. Admin access to the website (must be ok with Bengimin Knapp (as he paid
> for domain).
> 2. Admin or moderator access to the forums.
> 3. Have suggestions or recommendation for the web site or anything
> contained within.
>
> I am an admin guy, not a web site designer.  (I'm doing the best I know
> how), and would seriously appreciate feedback and input.
>
> Thank you,  That is all, Please return to your previous program....
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Logan Streondj <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> So what is this "inorganic tissue" made from? silicon?
>
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:48:17AM +1000, Colin Hales wrote:
> > Hi Dorian et. al.,
> >
> > I am going to have to piecemeal this. Up to armpits in crocs. Can't
> commit
> > to chat just yet.
> >
> > I have a suggestion for this bit
> > ===============================
> > Why H-AGI?
> >
> >    - Present different forms of computation , ( particular forms of
> >    computation analog, digital -Turing machines )
> >    - Computations in the brain (examples of computations that are hardly
> >    replicated on digital computers) *I can do this (see below)*
> >    - H-AGI can include all forms of computations:
> >    algorithmic/non-algorithmic, analog/digital,*
> >    quantum/classical. Organic/Inorganic. *H-AGI incorporates whatever
> level
> >    of natural biophysics is thought essential to AGI operation. It is
> that
> >    biophysics that introduces some desired level of natural computation
> into
> >    the H-AGI. The biophysics is literally incorporated in the
> >    processor/chipset. This could take the form of actual biological
> substrate
> >    (cellular tissue) or it could be an inorganic version of some part of
> the
> >    biophysics of the organic original.
> >    - The reason for beginning a program of H-AGI works is that by virtue
> of
> >    its retention of the natural biophysics, it allows us to
> scientifically
> >    determine the role of the natural biophysics in intelligence.
> >    Properties potentially lost the moment the boundary of any abstract
> model
> >    of the biophysics is chosen.
> >    - H-AGI recognises the significance of the loss of natural biophysics
> >    has had essentially no attention in AI or AGI, both of which have been
> >    confined to the 100% elimination of the natural biophysics. H-AGI
> commences
> >    that investigation, not because of any particular knowledge, but
> because
> >    the choice not to do it has had almost no attention since the
> inception of
> >    AI.
> >
> > ===========================================
> > Next, I would add another whole section to Dorian's wet version of H-AGI:
> > the 'dry' inorganic version. The wet version sounds fine to me. No
> problem.
> > I don't claim to have thought deeply about that. So I defer to Dorian.
> >
> > For the dry H-AGI I have already generated an example (in the paper I
> have
> > already written). I show the natural original, the modelled version
> (C-AGI)
> > and the inorganic version (H-AGI). It is not synthetic S-AGI because it
> > doesn't have *all* the brain's biophysics. It only has that tiny
> proportion
> > of the natural physics being explored for its role in intelligence. It is
> > not C-AGI and it is not S-AGI. It is H-AGI. Somewhere in between. Where
> the
> > natural biophysics computation stops the abstract modelling (analog or
> > digital) takes over in its more traditional guises (computer or
> > neuromorphic chip). Dry H-AGI doesn't have *all* the brain's biophysics.
> >
> > Biological tissue usage is (wet) H-AGI because it introduces a proportion
> > of natural tissue (not the whole brain). All the biophysics, not all the
> > brain.  Inorganic replication of biological tissue biophysics is H-AGI
> > because it retains part of the biophysics but is till not the whole
> brain.
> > Both wet and dry approaches are also H-AGI because they traditional
> > modelling as a form of container for the biophysics.
> >
> > (Aside: The organic/wet H-AGI and the inorganic/dry H-AGI could be
> classed
> > as quantum-mechanical in nature by virtue of the biophysics ultimately
> > being based on quantum processes. Classical physics is the only thing
> > needed to describe it at the functional/construction level. The
> properties
> > conferred through the quantum substrate are something to be argued *after
> > you built it, IMO*)
> >
> > *Summary*
> > Dorian wants to do H-AGI biologically. I want to do it inorganically.
> Both
> > are really hard. Neither are synthetic S-AGI because they also have
> > abstract modelling of other brain processes. If Dorian made a brain
> > entirely out of organics (no abstract computation/models) , that would be
> > synthetic. If I made a brain entirely out of inorganics (no abstract
> > computation/models), that would be synthetic.
> >
> > Wet *and* Dry H-AGI are needed in an expanded conceptual basis for AGI
> > future development. All  that is required is to see that these
> initiatives
> > are currently unexplored and that the scientific knowledge needed to see
> > which approach offers what future, and thereby put the pure abstract
> > modelling approach on a scientific footing,  is what the IGI is about.
> >
> > The Dry H-AGI section is what I want to add. I am hoping that we are on
> the
> > same page as regards the compartmentalisation of different approaches.
> >
> > Gnarly bits? Please advise.
> >
> > Gotta go ... panic prep for sale of my brother's house.
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Colin Hales
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > AGI
> > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> > RSS Feed:
> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/5037279-a88c7a6d
> > Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> AGI
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/27079473-66e47b26
> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mark Seveland
>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/19999924-4a978ccc> |
> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
> <http://www.listbox.com>
>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/27079473-66e47b26> |
> Modify
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>
> Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com>
>



-- 
Regards,
Mark Seveland



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to