I thought about the frustration an infant has, and asked "Why do babies cry?".
And I found an answer to my earlier question, what drives intensity up:  
urgency.The intensity of the appraisal could equal  the urgency of the 
intention. 
Cheers.
~PM

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [agi] Defining "frustration"
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:35:15 -0700




I've been reading Appraisal Theory  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appraisal_theory   for the past year. One 
approach used Maslow's hierarchy as the dimensions upon which valence and 
intensity occur.
In my case I'm just attempting something simple, using emotion to reprioritize 
intentions. Using the framework I outlined below. It's a little less than other 
approaches but I think it will suffice for my needs.  I just wanted some 
feedback.
That's all. 

~PM

From: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:58:59 +0000
Subject: Re: [agi] Defining "frustration"
To: [email protected]

Aggression drives up intensity. If you are asking what else drives up 
intensity, then perhaps look at any of the plethora of emotion wheel charts. 
There are lots of sources for this sort of thing - there even used to be a 
poster on this list trumpeting ethical AI classifications - who coincidentally 
seems to have just moved over to reddit today (based on his postings). 

Broadening the context a bit - perhaps consider some gradient for the 
intentions as well, such as Maslow's hierarchy. Motivation certainly plays a 
role. It appears that you are following a path similar to Barrett's conceptual 
act model of emotion. Regardless, there are lots of factors that can be thrown 
into the mix: embodiment, the *varying*  effect of valence on reaching a goal, 
culture, task switching - to name a few.


Some relevant links:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3260787/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3827669/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conceptual_act_model_of_emotion
http://www.reddit.com/user/JohnLaMuth
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs
http://mindblog.dericbownds.net/2015/04/positive-and-negative-emotions-valence.html
http://www.fractal.org/Bewustzijns-Besturings-Model/Nature-of-emotions.htm
http://mindblog.dericbownds.net/2015/07/happy-or-anxious.html
http://mindblog.dericbownds.net/2014/01/bodily-maps-of-emotions.html
http://m.cacm.acm.org/magazines/2014/12/180787-computationally-modeling-human-emotion/fulltext
https://www.google.com/search?q=images:emotions+wheel+chart
http://wiki.opencog.org/w/OpenPsi_(Embodiment)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:51 PM Piaget Modeler <[email protected]> 
wrote:



Cool. 
decrease in valence (to negative), and increase in intensity (to positive). 
I understand why the valence would drive down because of lack of success in 
achieving goals over time. What do you think would drive the intensity up? 
Thoughts? 
~PM

From: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 01:29:28 +0000
Subject: Re: [agi] Defining "frustration"
To: [email protected]

Researchers often consider frustration in a social context and correlates it 
with anger - which in turn correlates with reactive aggression; frustration 
control (again in a social context) through positive reinforcement. 

>From such positions, it can be inferred that frustration represents an 
>increase in negative valence, and via anger->aggression as an increase in 
>intensity.  
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:45 PM Piaget Modeler <[email protected]> 
wrote:



Assume that there are four basic feelings an AGI can have toward one of its 
intentions:
Joy  - the intention is achievedDistress - the intention has failedHope - the 
intention is likely to succeedFear - the intention is likely to fail
Feelings about an intention can be written
[Intention ^ Intention_1 :Feeling Hope]
[Intention ^ Intention_2 :Feeling Distress]

Assume also that an AGI has a prevailing mood and affect defined as follows:
Affect - the momentary evaluation of progress of the system towards its 
intentions               measured as valence (positive or negative) and 
intensity (weak (-1) to Strong(+1)).
Mood - the average evaluation of progress of the system towards its intentions  
            over some long time interval measured as valence (positive or 
negative)              and intensity (weak (-1) to intense (+1)).
We can define a mood change as follows:
[Mood :Valence negative :Intensity Strong] + [Affect :Valence positive 
:Intensity Weak]  = upturn 
[Mood :Valence positive :Intensity Weak]  + [Affect :Valence negative 
:Intensity Strong] = downturn 
The question is how does one define frustration about the AGI's feeling toward 
an intention, using its current affect and mood?
Thoughts? 



                                          


  
    
      
      AGI | Archives

 | Modify
 Your Subscription


      
    
  







  
    
      
      AGI | Archives

 | Modify
 Your Subscription


      
    
  

                                          


  
    
      
      AGI | Archives

 | Modify
 Your Subscription


      
    
  







  
    
      
      AGI | Archives

 | Modify
 Your Subscription


      
    
  

                                          


  
    
      
      AGI | Archives

 | Modify
 Your Subscription


      
    
  

                                          


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to