Ben, aren't some of your estimations regarding OpenCog also based on the
assumed computational power of our brain? Are you implying that OpenCog
could potentially deliver a human-level AGI on a 2-3 order of magnitude
less powerful hardware than our brains? That kind of sounds like nature
is 2-3 orders of magnitude less efficient hardware wise (yeah, not power
wise)?
I would love to hear from anybody with thoughts on this! :-)
On 15.03.2017 07:19, Ben Goertzel wrote:
Obviously, these interesting new neuroscience results should be
exciting and disturbing to anyone attempting to build AGI based on the
"conventional" perspectives of neuroscience ... but for those of us
building AGI based on non-neuroscience-oriented considerations,
they're not terribly relevant...
-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
