> I would point out that this distinction, as are many others, is
> not as clear
> as we might think.  The book on symbiosis points out that, in fact,
> something more than 30% of the human body is other symbiotic
> organisms, such
> as intestinal flora, skin mites, etc., and that even the cell is
> a symbiosis
> of many once independent prokaryotic organisms.  Even the human
> genome is a
> collection of genetic material from what were once separate species!

It's true "self/nonself discrimination" is a partial model of immune
function only, and it's a model that we've imposed *partly* out of our
innate bias toward making self/nonself distinctions..

> Some of the symbiotic organisms in our body, in fact, play a role in the
> immune system.
>
> Thus, this "sense of self" and identity that you are discussing is, we may
> find, much more amorphous than you think, and the boundary
> between self and
> not-self much more fractal.

In human psychology, we have to some extent a situation where the boundary
becomes reified because we think it's there!

In the mind, a fuzzy boundary often becomes more solid by being perceived as
solid..

> How does symbiosis have relevance to the quasi-Buddhist debate
> you and Kevin
> are engaged in?  On a simple level, it's a validation of the Novamente
> design philosophy of combining separate entities together to
> generate a more
> general, robust meta-entity.  It seems evolution has used that
> strategy for
> some billion years ... and it works!  (So far . . . )

Check out my article on symbiogenesis

http://www.goertzel.org/papers/CancerPrograms.htm

;-)

> One another one of many levels, there is the idea that true AGI will not,
> indeed, be a separate entity, but rather a symbiotic enhancement of the
> human mind.  It will provide perception, analysis, processing, learning
> (copying), and all kinds of other functionalities that people
> have included
> in intelligence, but the human part will still be a necessary component
> providing meaning and stuff like that.

I don't think this is the whole story.

I think that there will be AGI that symbiotically enhances human minds, but
also AGI that stands on its own providing full awareness without need for
human interaction.

ben  g

-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to