> > I used the assumptions of Hans Moravec to arrive at Human Equivalent > Computer processing power: > > http://www.frc.ri.cmu.edu/~hpm/ > > Of course as we get closer to AGI then the error delta becomes smaller. I > am comfortable with the name for now and will adjust the metric as more > info becomes available. >
The error delta depends more on neuroscience research than AGI progress. I'm not comfortable with Moravec's calculations, but his approach of estimating based on retinal processing power is better than anything else I've read on it. Retinal neurons aren't quite the same beasts as the enormous pyramidal's that make up much of the brain though. > > > > This isn't to say that the regression isn't a bad idea, or irrelevant to AGI >design. I just don't like the title. > > > > -Brad Oops, I meant to that "This isn't to say that the regression *is* a bad idea". ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
